أكاديمية العبقري المتميز

Karl Black Karl Black

0 دورة ملتحَق بها • 0 اكتملت الدورة

سيرة شخصية

Vce Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Format, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Questions Answers

2025 Latest TrainingDump Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate PDF Dumps and Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1-Cs4rDpM_lNnvxwi8MsSgjw7E2px_dAo

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam dumps save your study and preparation time. Our experts have added hundreds of Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate (Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate) questions similar to the real exam. You can prepare for the Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate (Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate) exam dumps during your job. You don't need to visit the market or any store because TrainingDump Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate (Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate) exam questions are easily accessible from the website.

TrainingDump Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate (Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate) exam dumps save your study and preparation time. Our experts have added hundreds of Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate (Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate) questions similar to the real exam. You can prepare for the Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate (Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate) exam dumps during your job. You don't need to visit the market or any store because TrainingDump Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions are easily accessible from the website.

>> Vce Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Format <<

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Questions Available At 50% Discount With Free Demo

There are other countless advantages of the Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam that you can avail of after passing the Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate exam. But keep in mind to pass the Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam is a difficult job. You have to put in some extra effort, time, and investment then you will be confident to perform well in the final Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate exam. In this journey, you can get help from Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Dumps that will assist you in Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate exam preparation and prepare you to perform well in the final Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate exam.

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic
Details

Topic 1

Assembling and Deploying Applications: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers get knowledge about coding a chain using a pyfunc mode, coding a simple chain using langchain, and coding a simple chain according to requirements. Additionally, the topic focuses on basic elements needed to create a RAG application. Lastly, the topic addresses sub-topics about registering the model to Unity Catalog using MLflow.

Topic 2

Design Applications: The topic focuses on designing a prompt that elicits a specifically formatted response. It also focuses on selecting model tasks to accomplish a given business requirement. Lastly, the topic covers chain components for a desired model input and output.

Topic 3

Governance: Generative AI Engineers who take the exam get knowledge about masking techniques, guardrail techniques, and legal
licensing requirements in this topic.

Topic 4

Data Preparation: Generative AI Engineers covers a chunking strategy for a given document structure and model constraints. The topic also focuses on filter extraneous content in source documents. Lastly, Generative AI Engineers also learn about extracting document content from provided source data and format.

Topic 5

Application Development: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers learn about tools needed to extract data, Langchain
similar tools, and assessing responses to identify common issues. Moreover, the topic includes questions about adjusting an LLM's response, LLM guardrails, and the best LLM based on the attributes of the application.

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q14-Q19):

NEW QUESTION # 14
Generative AI Engineer at an electronics company just deployed a RAG application for customers to ask questions about products that the company carries. However, they received feedback that the RAG response often returns information about an irrelevant product.
What can the engineer do to improve the relevance of the RAG's response?

A. Implement caching for frequently asked questions
B. Use a different LLM to improve the generated response
C. Assess the quality of the retrieved context
D. Use a different semantic similarity search algorithm

Answer: C

Explanation:
In a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system, the key to providing relevant responses lies in the quality of the retrieved context. Here's why option A is the most appropriate solution:
* Context Relevance:The RAG model generates answers based on retrieved documents or context. If the retrieved information is about an irrelevant product, it suggests that the retrieval step is failing to select the right context. The Generative AI Engineer must first assess the quality of what is being retrieved and ensure it is pertinent to the query.
* Vector Search and Embedding Similarity:RAG typically uses vector search for retrieval, where embeddings of the query are matched against embeddings of product descriptions. Assessing the semantic similarity searchprocess ensures that the closest matches are actually relevant to the query.
* Fine-tuning the Retrieval Process:By improving theretrieval quality, such as tuning the embeddings or adjusting the retrieval strategy, the system can return more accurate and relevant product information.
* Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:
* B (Caching FAQs): Caching can speed up responses for frequently asked questions but won't improve the relevance of the retrieved content for less frequent or new queries.
* C (Use a Different LLM): Changing the LLM only affects the generation step, not the retrieval process, which is the core issue here.
* D (Different Semantic Search Algorithm): This could help, but the first step is to evaluate the current retrieval context before replacing the search algorithm.
Therefore, improving and assessing the quality of the retrieved context (option A) is the first step to fixing the issue of irrelevant product information.

NEW QUESTION # 15
A Generative AI Engineer has been asked to design an LLM-based application that accomplishes the following business objective: answer employee HR questions using HR PDF documentation.
Which set of high level tasks should the Generative AI Engineer's system perform?

A. Calculate averaged embeddings for each HR document, compare embeddings to user query to find the best document. Pass the best document with the user query into an LLM with a large context window to generate a response to the employee.
B. Create an interaction matrix of historical employee questions and HR documentation. Use ALS to factorize the matrix and create embeddings. Calculate the embeddings of new queries and use them to find the best HR documentation. Use an LLM to generate a response to the employee question based upon the documentation retrieved.
C. Split HR documentation into chunks and embed into a vector store. Use the employee question to retrieve best matched chunks of documentation, and use the LLM to generate a response to the employee based upon the documentation retrieved.
D. Use an LLM to summarize HR documentation. Provide summaries of documentation and user query into an LLM with a large context window to generate a response to the user.

Answer: C

Explanation:
To design an LLM-based application that can answer employee HR questions using HR PDF documentation, the most effective approach is option D. Here's why:
* Chunking and Vector Store Embedding:HR documentation tends to be lengthy, so splitting it into smaller, manageable chunks helps optimize retrieval. These chunks are then embedded into avector store(a database that stores vector representations of text). Each chunk of text is transformed into an embeddingusing a transformer-based model, which allows for efficient similarity-based retrieval.
* Using Vector Search for Retrieval:When an employee asks a question, the system converts their query into an embedding as well. This embedding is then compared with the embeddings of the document chunks in the vector store. The most semantically similar chunks are retrieved, which ensures that the answer is based on the most relevant parts of the documentation.
* LLM to Generate a Response:Once the relevant chunks are retrieved, these chunks are passed into the LLM, which uses them as context to generate a coherent and accurate response to the employee's question.
* Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:
* A (Calculate Averaged Embeddings): Averaging embeddings might dilute important information. It doesn't provide enough granularity to focus on specific sections of documents.
* B (Summarize HR Documentation): Summarization loses the detail necessary for HR-related queries, which are often specific. It would likely miss the mark for more detailed inquiries.
* C (Interaction Matrix and ALS): This approach is better suited for recommendation systems and not for HR queries, as it's focused on collaborative filtering rather than text-based retrieval.
Thus, option D is the most effective solution for providing precise and contextual answers based on HR documentation.

NEW QUESTION # 16
A Generative Al Engineer is developing a RAG application and would like to experiment with different embedding models to improve the application performance.
Which strategy for picking an embedding model should they choose?

A. Pick an embedding model with multilingual support to support potential multilingual user questions
B. Pick the most recent and most performant open LLM released at the time
C. pick the embedding model ranked highest on the Massive Text Embedding Benchmark (MTEB) leaderboard hosted by HuggingFace
D. Pick an embedding model trained on related domain knowledge

Answer: D

Explanation:
The task involves improving a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) application's performance by experimenting with embedding models. The choice of embedding model impacts retrieval accuracy,which is critical for RAG systems. Let's evaluate the options based on Databricks Generative AI Engineer best practices.
* Option A: Pick an embedding model trained on related domain knowledge
* Embedding models trained on domain-specific data (e.g., industry-specific corpora) produce vectors that better capture the semantics of the application's context, improving retrieval relevance. For RAG, this is a key strategy to enhance performance.
* Databricks Reference:"For optimal retrieval in RAG systems, select embedding models aligned with the domain of your data"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks," 2023).
* Option B: Pick the most recent and most performant open LLM released at the time
* LLMs are not embedding models; they generate text, not embeddings for retrieval. While recent LLMs may be performant for generation, this doesn't address the embedding step in RAG. This option misunderstands the component being selected.
* Databricks Reference: Embedding models and LLMs are distinct in RAG workflows:
"Embedding models convert text to vectors, while LLMs generate responses"("Generative AI Cookbook").
* Option C: Pick the embedding model ranked highest on the Massive Text Embedding Benchmark (MTEB) leaderboard hosted by HuggingFace
* The MTEB leaderboard ranks models across general tasks, but high overall performance doesn't guarantee suitability for a specific domain. A top-ranked model might excel in generic contexts but underperform on the engineer's unique data.
* Databricks Reference: General performance is less critical than domain fit:"Benchmark rankings provide a starting point, but domain-specific evaluation is recommended"("Databricks Generative AI Engineer Guide").
* Option D: Pick an embedding model with multilingual support to support potential multilingual user questions
* Multilingual support is useful only if the application explicitly requires it. Without evidence of multilingual needs, this adds complexity without guaranteed performance gains for the current use case.
* Databricks Reference:"Choose features like multilingual support based on application requirements"("Building LLM-Powered Applications").
Conclusion: Option A is the best strategy because it prioritizes domain relevance, directly improving retrieval accuracy in a RAG system-aligning with Databricks' emphasis on tailoring models to specific use cases.

NEW QUESTION # 17
A Generative Al Engineer is deciding between using LSH (Locality Sensitive Hashing) and HNSW (Hierarchical Navigable Small World) for indexing their vector database Their top priority is semantic accuracy Which approach should the Generative Al Engineer use to evaluate these two techniques?

A. Compare the Levenshtein distances of returned results against a representative sample of test inputs
B. Compare the Recall-Onented-Understudy for Gistmg Evaluation (ROUGE) scores of returned results for a representative sample of test inputs
C. Compare the cosine similarities of the embeddings of returned results against those of a representative sample of test inputs
D. Compare the Bilingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU) scores of returned results for a representative sample of test inputs

Answer: C

Explanation:
The task is to choose between LSH and HNSW for a vector database index, prioritizing semantic accuracy.
The evaluation must assess how well each method retrieves semantically relevant results. Let's evaluate the options.
* Option A: Compare the cosine similarities of the embeddings of returned results against those of a representative sample of test inputs
* Cosine similarity measures semantic closeness between vectors, directly assessing retrieval accuracy in a vector database. Comparing returned results' embeddings to test inputs' embeddings evaluates how well LSH or HNSW preserves semantic relationships, aligning with the priority.
* Databricks Reference:"Cosine similarity is a standard metric for evaluating vector search accuracy"("Databricks Vector Search Documentation," 2023).
* Option B: Compare the Bilingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU) scores of returned results for a representative sample of test inputs
* BLEU evaluates text generation (e.g., translations), not vector retrieval accuracy. It's irrelevant for indexing performance.
* Databricks Reference:"BLEU applies to generative tasks, not retrieval"("Generative AI Cookbook").
* Option C: Compare the Recall-Oriented-Understudy for Gisting Evaluation (ROUGE) scores of returned results for a representative sample of test inputs
* ROUGE is for summarization evaluation, not vector search. It doesn't measure semantic accuracy in retrieval.
* Databricks Reference:"ROUGE is unsuited for vector database evaluation"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option D: Compare the Levenshtein distances of returned results against a representative sample of test inputs
* Levenshtein distance measures string edit distance, not semantic similarity in embeddings. It's inappropriate for vector-based retrieval.
* Databricks Reference: No specific support for Levenshtein in vector search contexts.
Conclusion: Option A (cosine similarity) is the correct approach, directly evaluating semantic accuracy in vector retrieval, as recommended by Databricks for Vector Search assessments.

NEW QUESTION # 18
A Generative AI Engineer is building a RAG application that will rely on context retrieved from source documents that are currently in PDF format. These PDFs can contain both text and images. They want to develop a solution using the least amount of lines of code.
Which Python package should be used to extract the text from the source documents?

A. unstructured
B. numpy
C. beautifulsoup
D. flask

Answer: A

Explanation:
* Problem Context: The engineer needs to extract text from PDF documents, which may contain both text and images. The goal is to find a Python package that simplifies this task using the least amount of code.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: flask: Flask is a web framework for Python, not suitable for processing or extracting content from PDFs.
* Option B: beautifulsoup: Beautiful Soup is designed for parsing HTML and XML documents, not PDFs.
* Option C: unstructured: This Python package is specifically designed to work with unstructured data, including extracting text from PDFs. It provides functionalities to handle various types of content in documents with minimal coding, making it ideal for the task.
* Option D: numpy: Numpy is a powerful library for numerical computing in Python and does not provide any tools for text extraction from PDFs.
Given the requirement,Option C(unstructured) is the most appropriate as it directly addresses the need to efficiently extract text from PDF documents with minimal code.

NEW QUESTION # 19
......

A free demo of any Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam dumps format will be provided by TrainingDump to the one who wants to assess before purchasing. The desktop Customer Experience Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Practice Exam software is compatible with windows based computers. There is a 24/7 customer support team of TrainingDump always to fix any problems.

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Questions Answers: https://www.trainingdump.com/Databricks/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate-practice-exam-dumps.html

P.S. Free & New Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate dumps are available on Google Drive shared by TrainingDump: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1-Cs4rDpM_lNnvxwi8MsSgjw7E2px_dAo